The Research Office, Office for Research Development is requesting letters of intent for the National Science Foundation- IUSE: Pathways into Geoscience (IUSE: GEOPATHS) program.

NSF 17-574

Office for Research Development Letter of Intent submission deadline: Monday, July 31, 2017

  • Agency Letter of Intent due:  August 18, 2017                                                  
  • Agency Full Proposal Deadline: October 18, 2017
  • Anticipated Funding Amount:  $6 million total in FY 2017
  • Estimated Number of Awards: 20

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 1

  • An organization may serve as sole submitting institution or as lead institution of a collaborative project on only one submission per competition, regardless of track, but may serve as the non-lead institution of a collaborative project more than once per competition. Additional eligibility requirements are described later in the solicitation.

Synopsis of Program:

NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) initiative, launched in Fiscal Year 2014, supports a coherent set of investments to address immediate challenges and opportunities that are facing undergraduate STEM education, as well as those that anticipate new structures (e.g. organizational changes, new methods for certification or credentialing, course re-conception, cyberlearning, etc.) and new functions of the undergraduate learning and teaching enterprise. The NSF-wide IUSE initiative acknowledges the variety of discipline-specific challenges and opportunities facing STEM faculty as they strive to incorporate results from educational research into classroom practice and work with education research colleagues and social science learning scholars to advance our understanding of effective teaching and learning.

Information:  Research.development@oregonstate.edu

General guidance for preparation of letters of intent to the Research Office:

COVER SHEET (1 page)

Solicitation Name and Descriptive Title

Project Summary:  3 or 4 sentences or bullet points that provide an overview of the objective of your proposed research, how you plan to do it, and the expected outcome.

Unique Aspects:  3 or 4 sentences or bullet points that highlight how your research/approach is different/better.

Key PI/co-PIs:  5 or 6 sentences or bullet points that highlight team expertise as it relates to the project.

Budget:  Example:  The total cost of the project is anticipated to be $ X, with $ Y being requested from the NSF.  NSF funds will be used for: $ A for personnel; $ B for operations, and $ C for broader impacts/subcontracts etc. 

Justification for NSF support: One paragraph explaining why this research fits with the RFP and strategic goals of NSF. 

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (1 - 4 pages)

Problem statement : Clear and concise statement of 1) research question(s) and how the project will address the research question(s); 2) what technical barriers need to be overcome to perform the research; and 3) how the proposed research can lead to the advancement of research/knowledge in this area.

Conceptual framework: Conceptual framework describing, for example, how the synthesis of various project components, approaches, and participant expertise are linked together to address the problem of interest.  Graphics may be used.

Proposed activities: Describe the project to be undertaken and provide the technical specifications of the research activities and timelines that will be undertaken.

Expected results: Describe the outcome you anticipate from the research. (Remember your initial motivation for wanting to do this!)

Peer Groups: Who else is doing something similar, why their discoveries are useful for you, and what discriminates you.

Broader Impact/Metrics for Success: What metrics are the most appropriate for evaluating the success of the proposed project (e.g., peer-reviewed papers, policy-directed efforts, databases, models, development of new resources, etc.)? If successful, who would most likely use the knowledge or tools developed?

Fundraising:  List any matching fund requests, industry commitments etc.  List any similar current proposals pending.

 

Suggested Reviewers: (1 page) Optional – but as you write envision who might be a reviewer of your proposal or the Program Officer.

Reviewer 1: Area of expertise

Name

Title

Contact

State why you think this person would be a good reviewer.

 

Submit electronically as a PDF document to: Research.Development@oregonstate.edu

Expiration: 
Monday, July 31, 2017
Date Open: 
Friday, July 7, 2017
Source: 
External
Sponsor: 
National Science Foundation