- Advancing your Research
- Major Initiatives
- Centers and Institutes
- Office for Research Development
- Cannabis Research
- International Research
Next due dates are:
NSF Advanced Informal STEM Learning (AISL) is now limited. See below.
Monday, August 19, 2019 LOI Intent deadline 5pm pacific standard time. email@example.com
Note the changes:
Interested - please email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) program seeks to advance new approaches to and evidence-based understanding of the design and development of STEM learning opportunities for the public in informal environments; provide multiple pathways for broadening access to and engagement in STEM learning experiences; advance innovative research on and assessment of STEM learning in informal environments; and engage the public of all ages in learning STEM in informal environments.
In an effort to provide the highest level of excellence and viability for funding, a review process will be put in place if more than one proposal is submitted. The finalist will be asked to represent Oregon State University and to submit their proposal to the National Science Foundation- program Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) by the NSF letter of intent deadline. Information: email Research.Development@oregonstate.edu
The AISL program supports six types of projects: (1) Pilots and Feasibility Studies, (2) Research in Service to Practice, (3) Innovations in Development, (4) Broad Implementation, (5) Literature Reviews, Syntheses, or Meta-Analyses, and (6) Conferences.
The AISL program’s priorities are:
COVER SHEET (1-2 pages)
Solicitation Name and Descriptive Title - identify the AISL project type: Pilots and Feasibility Studies, Research in Service to Practice, Innovations in Development, Broad Implementation, or Conferences, Literature Reviews, Syntheses, or Meta-analyses, or Conferences. For Literature Reviews, Syntheses, or Meta-analyses, indicate which kind is being proposed. .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (2 - 4 pages)
Suggested Reviewers: (1 page) Optional – but as you write envision who might be a reviewer of your proposal or the Program Officer.
Reviewer 1: Area of expertise
State why you think this person would be a good reviewer.
Submit electronically as a PDF document to: Research.Development@oregonstate.edu